2026-02-10
Clarifying developer settings The developer message mentions default approvals for failures, but there are no specific details about sandboxing. Typically, it involves workspace-write and network capabilities. I should avoid unnecessary network calls and try relying on existing knowledge, while steering clear of misinformation. It’s probably best to ask the user for clarification about which season window they want, perhaps specifically the 2023-2025 season. I'll provide a summary template of notable changes while confirming details about transfers, like Davidson and others.Asking for clarification I want to avoid fabricating information, so I need to ask the user for clarification on which season they're referencing and whether to include confirmed transfers or just rumors. I'll present a high-level analysis framework that covers likely outgoings, reliance on U23 players, tactical shifts, and depth issues. I'll provide a structured approach that includes key positions and factors to consider. I could suggest the user share their current squad list and possibly offer to pull recent data if network access is allowed. I'll keep my response concise yet informative.Clarifying player information I noticed that there's uncertainty about various players, like whether someone moved to Wuhan Three Towns recently. I realize it's better not to name uncertain players specifically; instead, I should keep things more generic. I want to ask the user for a clearer timeframe about their request. I plan to provide a template analysis along with what information we need for a collaborative approach. Here’s the draft I’m considering: asking about the target window, offering an immediate high-level reading of the situation, outlining typical positional changes, and setting up a depth chart template. I can also offer to pull the latest official list if they approve or analyze one they share.Setting browsing boundaries I want to avoid offering to browse unless it's absolutely necessary. However, I can casually mention that I'm able to look up information if the user wants that. In keeping with the "Final answer style," I should stick to minimal requests. I'll use bullet points for clarity while possibly including disclaimers about "possible trends." This way, I can provide information without overwhelming or assuming too much. Let's go ahead and produce that!


想确认下你要分析的是哪个赛季/转会窗的阵容变化?例如:
我可以先给一套通用的分析框架,等你确认时间点后补上具体球员与结论。
武汉三镇阵容变化——通用研判要点
你确认具体时间范围后,我会按以下结构给出结论:
如果你愿意,我也可以基于最新官方名单做精确版(提供赛季或允许我检索一下即可)。
Copyright 2024 九游APP - 九游(中国)官方网站 - 9YOU All Rights by 九游APP